Lee Cuesta

Lee Cuesta

Thursday, November 11, 2010

The Ultimate 11:11 Event

I know there is something important and significant about seeing 11:11 on a digital clock -- inadvertently, accidentally, somewhat subconsciously.  It happens to me too frequently to ignore it.  So today is Thursday, November 11, which is 11-11 once again.  And because of that, I am hereby beginning the official countdown on my website to The Ultimate 11:11 Event, which will occur next year in 2011, when November 11 will be 11.11.11.
More details will be forthcoming, but for now, my announcement contains these three elements:

  • Here on this website there will be a reverse timeclock counting down to the time 11:11:11 AM on the date 11.11.11.
  • I am soliciting comments and posts from you about your own "11:11" experiences.
  • I will re-release my book, Once: Once, which means "11:11" in Spanish, and the official publication date will be 11.11.11.  This will actually be a revised, updated version -- including a new title and new cover art.
One footnote:  as I have mentioned in previous blogposts, today, being November 11, is Veterans Day.  And I've questioned why Veterans Day is always 11.11, regardless on which day of the week it falls, unlike most other holidays, which got moved to Mondays.  Part of this answer is the fact that Veterans Day began as Armistice Day (also known as Remembrance Day), commemorating the day on which the armistice, or peace agreement, was signed between the Allies of World War I and Germany, for the cessation of hostilities along the Western Front, which took effect at eleven o'clock in the morning -- the "eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month" of 1918.  


  

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Earthquake Envy

March 12 will mark the two-month anniversary of the devastating earthquake in Haiti. With only a magnitude of 7.0 on the Richter Scale, 212,000 people died because of the quake, and more than 300,000 were injured. The presidential palace collapsed. Mass graves were dug. In all, an estimated three million people were affected by the quake. These statistics are according to CNN.com, reported one month after the event.

I write “only a magnitude of 7.0” because more recently, on February 27, at 3:34 a.m., “a magnitude 8.8 earthquake strikes Chile while most people are sleeping,” according to CNN. However, as of March 4, this far greater earthquake has only killed “more than 800 people.”

As a result, the president of Chile, Michelle Bachelet, might feel deprived. No one would blame her. Her country received the larger earthquake, but less damage. Not only that, the Haiti earthquake had already stolen the spotlight. So her public relations job has been to drum up support for a second-rate earthquake.

This is very important because $1,554,992,908 in contributions and commitments have already been raised for the Haiti disaster. In other words, there is a lot at stake.

Under these circumstances, leaders of nations and relief agencies become envious of other countries’ calamities. They develop “earthquake envy,” trying to demonstrate that “my earthquake is worse than yours,” and thereby cash in on the catastrophe gravy-train. At 9:10 p.m. on the day of Chile’s earthquake, CNN reported that Bachelet stated the quake “has affected two million people” (albeit leaving merely 214 dead and 15 missing). Earthquake envy.

Another example: after the February 27 earthquake in Chile, a magnitude 6.4 earthquake rocked Taiwan on Thursday morning, March 4 (which was still March 3 on this side of the International Date Line). Since there was no immediate report of any deaths or injuries, the third short paragraph of the story reverts instead to the Typhoon Morakot, which “killed hundreds” last August. Envy.

It’s like, who remembers the name of the second devastating hurricane that hit the Gulf Coast following Katrina? I can’t remember. I think maybe it was Rita.

Meanwhile, back in Chile, President-elect Sebastian Piñera – who takes office tomorrow – said, “Our government will not be a government of the earthquake. Our government will be a government of reconstruction.”

Amid all the hype, I think one of the more sincerely poignant declarations came from the Haitian President Rene Preval when this current rash of earthquakes began. CNN reported:

“The presidential palace in Port-au-Prince was in ruins. Preval, Haiti’s president, said he did not know where he was going to sleep Wednesday night.”

(Note: both the presidential palace and his own home had collapsed.)

“‘I have plenty of time to look for a bed,’ he said late in the afternoon. ‘But now I am working on how to rescue the people. Sleeping is not the problem.’”

Personally, I am a survivor of multiple earthquakes and aftershocks (e.g., Thessaloniki, Greece, where approximately 50 people died; Mexico City; California’s Bay Area; etc.), and I know what these different magnitudes represent, and how they feel. An 8.8 quake – the one that hit Chile – is a monster. It is hard for me to imagine that the death toll was not higher – i.e., comparable to Haiti’s. I still wonder what could account for the wide disparity? How could it be that Chile received the far larger, monster earthquake, but far less damage?

Friday, February 5, 2010

The beginning of my quest

This marks the beginning of my quest. I don’t know what the answers will be. The unfortunate format of a blog is that it will appear in reverse chronology. In other words, in the months to come, this initial post of this series will be buried at the bottom, and my later conclusions will appear at the top, thereby concealing that it began as a quest, today, when I didn’t have any answers.

And the point where I’m beginning is with the “anchor babies.” I followed a link on the http://www.aztlan.net/ website, called “Anchor Baby Power.” There is a short video, roughly four and a half minutes. At the end there is some sort of pro-U.S. demonstration occurring along a sidewalk in some downtown area. It is filmed by somebody walking up to this group with a video camera. There are some tall palm trees along the street. Then, from across the street, you can hear children yelling, like chanting, “Mexico, Mexico, Mexico, Mexico” repeatedly, over and over, with the soft “x” like an “h”, as it is correct in Spanish, not with the hard “x” as in English. The invisible cameraman walks across the street, while still shooting video, and lifts up the camera over the wall, to get a shot of the schoolchildren chanting/yelling “Mexico, Mexico, Mexico, Mexico, Mexico…” obviously in response to the pro-U.S. demonstration that’s happening across the street. Then the camera pans back quickly to catch a final shot of the pro-U.S. demonstrators.

“The border remains a military zone,” the voiceover says. “We remain a hunted people. This is our homeland. We cannot, we will not, and we must not be made illegal in our own homeland! We are not immigrants that came from another country to another country; we are migrants free to travel the length and breadth of the Americas because we belong here! We are millions. We just have to survive. We have an aging, white America. They are not making babies. They’re dying. It’s a matter of time.”

Saturday, August 22, 2009

Dr. Charles Truxillo left without a home; fire destroys his apartment in Albuquerque

Lee,
Thanks for offering to help. Here is the information:
On August 4th, a fire broke out in the apartment complex where Dr. Charles Truxillo lived. The fire burned for 22 hours and he was left without a home, and literally nothing more than the clothes on his back. This has been an extremely difficult time for him as he is scheduled to begin teaching at UNM in just a week.

His friends in Albuquerque have set up a donation fund for him and I am asking as many friends as possible to make a donation. Please know that ANY amount would be greatly appreciated.

There are three ways that you can make a donation:

or you may go directly to www.paypal.com and click SEND MONEY, then type in his email address, TO: charlestruxillo@yahoo.com

Any donations made through www.paypal will be posted to his account within 24 hours at no cost to you.

BY MAIL: Truxillo Donation Fund, P.O. Box 26411, Albuquerque, NM 87125

WALK-IN: A donation can be made directly at First Community Bank, Truxillo Donation Fund.

We are thankful that he is safe and I would be grateful for any donation you are able to make.

THANK YOU!

P.S. Here are some video links regarding the fire:

Hi Lee,
I noticed that you did an interview with Charles Truxillo. I am trying to rally community support on his behalf. I was a student of his during my undergraduate studies, and I took four of his courses, which required travel for educational tours of Latin America (Mexico and Peru). On August 5, 2009, Dr. Truxillo's apartment complex was burned down to the ground. This complex is across the street from where I reside, and it was such a tragedy for the residents who lost everything they owned. Dr. Truxillo had an extensive library and art collection (which included original works). As I am sure you are aware, he is having a difficult time coping with this tragedy along with the fact that he lost his professorship last year, and he is only employed part time as a research fellow. In an effort to support him in this tragedy, a fund has been set up at 1st Community Bank of Albuquerque.
Thank you,
Rachel

Sunday, November 11, 2007

11-11-07

Here it is, 11-11, November 11. Today I just had a thought concerning my question in my previous post. I have a digital clock in my bathroom, which includes the date. So all day today when I glanced at that clock, it read 11-11. And it occurred to me that if 11:11 is a moment in time to intercede, then 11-11 is an entire day to intercede, perhaps for global peace, being Veterans’ Day.

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Veterans’ Day is always November 11, which is 11-11

Tomorrow is Veterans’ Day, which always is November 11. According to my count, this is one of only three government holidays that didn’t succumb to being shifted to a Monday for convenience. The other two would be Thanksgiving Day and Independence Day. This is a very elite group of holidays. For a long time, I have thought it was curious that November 11 – which is 11-11 – never changes for the observance of Veterans’ Day. Does anyone among my readers know the significance of 11-11 in relation to the military? Why is Veterans’ Day always on 11-11? Next year, 2008, 11-11 is the date precisely one week following Election Day, and that is the date on which my book, “11:11,” speculates that a Mexican general plans to invade the United States. The other odd “coincidence” is the fact that Independence Day, the Fourth of July, which of course is July 4, or 7+4, adds up to the number 11. And this is another holiday date that never changes. Why was this significant for our Founding Fathers? Let me know.

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

So will Mexico's northern states; and so will even Mexico's Mexicans Abroad.

On May 28, 9:53 am, "johnny@." wrote:
> May 28, 2007 US Hispanic News
> (PRLEAP.COM) Congressman Tom Tancredo, 2008 Republican presidential > candidate, calls the book "Great read!" in a handwritten note to its > author, Lee Cuesta. As the rising tide of "illegal immigrants" in the > United States demands amnesty, Cuesta's book relates the self-autonomy > movement in the Mexican state of Chiapas, to a similar movement > occurring in the American Southwest.
This "self-autonomy" concurs somewhat with what, from time to time, I have described on this NG, alt.politics.immigration, for years though attacked vehemently by Mexico City's lapdogs.
Again, Mexico is one of the few, if not the only, countries in the world which is named for its capital. It is Mexico City, even prior to the arrival of the Conquistadors, from where Mexico's Comandantes Maximos de Patrulias (such as Santa Anna) sally forth to sack and subjugate all within their grasp.
Even prior to the arrival of the Conquistadors, secession has always been a major current in Mexican affairs.
After the Californianos revolted against Mexico City and its tribute (still legal in Mexico) collectors sixteen times in the decade just prior to the declaration of Califorinia's independence as the Bear State, and the Texian's the same, everywhere eighty miles from Mexico City, there was revolt. The Yucatan had even achieved independence too.
Then Mexico City's subjected did know the absolute disingenuity of Mexico City including and especially its propagandizing of its very Mexican Constitution (that Santa Anna had nevertheless usurped to become yet another dictator): that by merely stating slavery to be illegal did not then or even still make it so.
The Mexican Government had even refused to fund Santa Anna's punitive expeditions into Texas forcing Santa Anna to procure the funds for his (not Mexico's) army from his own ill-gotten wealth, the treasury of his native state of Veracruz and the Catholic Church: funds he then used to purchase Mayans enslaved by the Yucatan's "Ladinos,"---Mayans who would then have to be brought, by their Creolle officers and masters, to the very battlefields themselves in ball-and-chain--- Mayans who, after the battle of San Jacinto, would then have to walk from Texas to their homes in the Yucatan to their rise themselves up in revolt in one of the most vicious wars in the history of the New Word: 'The War of the Castes (Races)'.
Upon General Winfield Scott's eventual arrival to Mexico City, Mexico's (liberal) central government even offered him, and the U.S. Army under his command, the very funds they had refused Santa Anna to accept as pay for his governance and ultimate establishment of a real democracy---hopefully free, once and for all, of their such perennial slavers and tyrants as Santa Anna---in Mexico.
Even now, as Chiapas seeks self-autonomy (secession) from Mexico City, so, most essentially, are the States of Oaxaca, Tabasco, the Yucatan and Guerrero also.
So will Mexico's northern states; and so will even Mexico's Mexicans Abroad.
(This is the link to the original comment above: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.impeach.bush/browse_thread/thread/06b79ee63a929069.)

Lee Cuesta exposes religious intolerance in southern Mexico

Issues like amnesty and immigration overshadow the truth about religious intolerance and persecution against evangelicals in southern Mexico, which remains unknown by most Americans. Lee Cuesta has written extensively on this human rights topic, while the Zapatista movement in Chiapas captures headlines instead.

While Cuesta and his family worked and lived outside of Mexico City, he became aware of the religious intolerance in the southern state of Chiapas. Cuesta traveled to Chiapas to observe the conditions, and to meet with pastor and lawyer Abdías Tovilla Jaime. He is director, legal consultant and founder of CEDECH, the State Committee of Chiapas for Evangelical Defense, located in the city of San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Mexico.

Tovilla began this ministry as a volunteer in response to the needs of persecuted believers. “Christian brothers arrived (in San Cristóbal) who’d been beaten,” he recalls. “They’d say, ‘Pastor, help us;’ so I had to do something, even though how to defend human rights was not something I learned in seminary.” In 1992, the National Presbyterian Church of Mexico made CEDECH one of its official ministries, with the slogan “For an integral, Christian liberty” (“Por una libertad cristiana integral”).

As a result of this experience, Cuesta’s three-part series exposing the religious persecution against evangelicals in Chiapas was first published by World Pulse. This series, including photographs, was subsequently reprinted in Indian Life, an international newspaper based in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

In turn, this series – along with his other articles that preceded it – formed the foundation for his book. The Canadian publication that reprinted his series, Indian Life, said of his book: “Like a story lifted off the page of today’s newspaper.”

Cuesta’s first article on the troubling situation in Chiapas reported two events in which approximately 350 evangelical Christians of the Tzotzil ethnic group “were brutally beaten, put in jail and expelled from their communities of origin, taking away all their belongings and burning some of the houses,” quoting one Mexican leader. All this occurred in spite of a religious freedom law, adopted in 1992, which ostensibly guaranteed that each individual shall “not be the object of discrimination, compulsion or hostility as a result of his religious beliefs.”

In his second article about this issue, Cuesta pointed out that “Mexico’s preoccupation with the Zapatista guerrilla army, both by politicians and the media, has overshadowed the other side of the Chiapas crisis: the 20,000 to 30,000 believers in Chiapas exiled ‘for professing the Protestant religion.’ ”

As a result of the persecution in the Chiapas highlands, several refugee settlements have sprung up around the city of San Cristóbal de Las Casas. Cuesta acquired firsthand experience by traveling to both San Cristóbal de Las Casas and Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, where he conducted on-site investigation and interviews, including a trip to San Juan Chamula, the renowned “headquarters” of such persecution.

Cuesta’s book is entitled Once: Once, with ISBN 0-7414-0650-0. It constitutes excellent material for reading groups in local churches, as well as a significant addition to church libraries. In addition, he is available to speak at churches – including reading groups – concerning the up-to-date situation in Chiapas, among other topics. He may be contacted via e-mail at info@leecuesta.com.

Besides the reports described above, Cuesta wrote many articles in Spanish that were published in Prisma, Desafío Transcultural, and the Mexican Presbyterian magazine, El Faro. One of these articles – “Las Seis Marcas Distintivas del Discipulado Verdadero y Práctico” – was subsequently adapted for the international magazine Apuntes Pastorales, and then reprinted again in Consejero Bíblico.

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Tancredo praises Cuesta’s book exposing hispanic autonomy arising from immigration

Congressman Tom Tancredo, 2008 Republican presidential candidate, calls the book “Great read!” in a handwritten note to its author, Lee Cuesta. As the rising tide of “illegal immigrants” in the United States demands amnesty, Cuesta’s book relates the self-autonomy movement in the Mexican state of Chiapas, to a similar movement occurring in the American Southwest.

As a speaker and journalist who lived and worked throughout Mexico (and Guatemala) for eight years, Cuesta has met both with leaders in Chiapas, and also with members of Estudiantes Contemporáneos Del Norte (ECDN), at the University of New Mexico, including Dr. Charles Truxillo. Many experts are now predicting that the Southwest shall secede from the US, unite with the northern tier of Mexican states, and create the autonomous “República del Norte.” A professor of Chicano Studies, Dr. Truxillo envisions this new, sovereign nation within this century. He has stated: “I may not live to see the Hispanic homeland, but by the end of the century my students’ kids will live in it, sovereign and free.” As Cuesta’s book predicted, Truxillo also said: “Its creation will be accomplished by the electoral pressure of the future majority Hispanic population in the region.”

Furthermore, Cuesta’s book points out that there is an historic precedent to this current trend. He writes that the document known as “The Plan of San Diego, Texas,” was signed on January 6, 1915, and envisioned an armed uprising against the government and country of the United States on February 20, 1915. The original Plan endeavored to reclaim the territory comprising Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado and California. The uprising failed to materialize, but two years later, in 1917, the German influence in the Plan led to the United States’ entrance into World War I.

Likewise, some modern observers believe that there is a silent conspiracy behind the overwhelming immigration from Mexico. They call it “La Reconquista.” One analyst concluded: “Just as their national plan clearly dictates, the Mexican government is preparing for an attack on America – an attack perpetrated through ideology and assimilation rather than with bullets and blood.” For this reason, an international newspaper based in Manitoba, Canada, described Cuesta’s book, “Like a story lifted off the page of today’s newspaper.”

Cuesta discovered that ECDN’s purpose statement reads: “Dedicated to the Chicanos del Norte in the hope of recovering their lost sovereignty and assuming their place among the independent nations of the world.” Many of the members express their views in an online newsletter called El Norte. A link to this newsletter is provided at www.leecuesta.com. One of them writes in El Norte: “Since 1848 Mexican people have been engaged in a slow process of regaining lands that they lost to the United States as a result of war.” Another one writes: “We seek to re-ignite the embers of self-determination and nationalistic thought and stand in solidarity with all indigenous people of the world in their struggle for sovereignty.”

Besides a link to their newsletter, El Norte, the ECDN website also contains links to essays associated with maps that detail the evolution of the American Southwest (or El Norte) in sequential order from 1000 A.D. through 2080, when it will be known as La República del Norte. The essay for the map of “North America circa 2080 A.D.” is written by Truxillo himself. A link is also provided to Dr. Truxillo’s paper entitled, “The Inevitability of a Mexicano Nation in the American Southwest and Northern Mexico.” In it, Truxillo states: “A new age of nationalism is sweeping the planet. Norteños are like Palestinians, Quebecois and Sri Lanka Tamils – new nationalities.” In fact, when Cuesta visited the campus in Albuquerque, and mentioned his experience in Chiapas, the ECDN members immediately identified the Zapatista movement as a similar phenomenon.

Saturday, July 29, 2006

Volatility in Mexico

Anyone who doubted the ultimate veracity of my recent post (June 29) should visit the following link:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/americas/07/26/mexico.obrador.ap/index.html

It is still undecided who the president of Mexico will be, or what the outcome will be regardless of the decision. Our southern neighbor now lacks the stability that the PRI provided for over seventy years.

Thursday, June 29, 2006

Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador will be the next president of Mexico

Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador will be the next president of Mexico. I’m on the record today – before the Mexican elections on July 2 – with this prediction. As of today, Lopez Obrador and his closest rival, Felipe Calderon, are running neck-and-neck. Yet I base my prediction (that Lopez Obrador will win the election) on two considerations. First, my own finger on the pulse of Mexican society. My Mexican associates tell me that they feel Lopez Obrador will be the presidential winner. Although voters say that they like Calderon, they now want to give the PRD a chance, just as they did with the PAN, to see how effective it might be governing the nation. This, in turn, is based upon the second factor. Whereas both candidates are attempting to use Mexico’s recent economic upturn to their political advantage, Calderon must concede that it has been his own party’s administration (under Vicente Fox) overseeing the economic stagnation of the past six years. And the PRI candidate isn’t even popular in this election. So I repeat: Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador will be the next president of Mexico. The question that remains is this: What effect will this new president have on Mexico-U.S. relations?

Thursday, May 18, 2006

“legal or illegal, it doesn’t matter”

Dear Lee: The freedom and prosperity all immigrants are seeking is undermined by the attitude expressed by Melanie Lugo “legal or illegal, it doesn’t matter,” (Million march for immigration reform, Tues., May 2, 2006). Her comment epitomizes the attitude that daily disrupts the fabric of Mexican culture in Mexico and which these illegal aliens wish to now impose on the United States. As a U.S. citizen I lived legally in Mexico for a many years. During that time I and my Mexican national friends were periodically victimized by the corrupt Mexican police officers prowling the streets, and the corrupt local and federal government workers extorting their fellow man because their attitude is “ 'legal or illegal, it doesn’t matter;' I need to provide for my family”. Isn’t this the very philosophy of the illegal aliens residing in our country? I am passionately calling for our country to reject this attitude so that all legitimate immigrants will find the freedom that they are seeking which ultimately depends upon “legal does matter”. Judy from Colorado

Thursday, May 19, 2005

“I loved your website!"

Today I am posting an e-mail comment that I received from a reader of my website who lives in Mexico. Here it is:
“I loved your website! Even I didn't know you had that many articles published, or that much knowledge! It's very informative and interesting! I'm so glad you finally got it running. I was just wondering... You have so much writing and Mexico history experience, why don't you come down here and associate yourself with some journalism organization or a magazine or something? I think you should be here in Mexico because that is what the heart of your writing is about, but I think you need to be here writing or with some organization. You see what I'm saying? I really enjoyed your blog also! The 11:11 thing is kind of freaky. I have noticed it more often ever since your book came out. And the link you have for the wanna-be president Lopez Obrador--we're all hoping he doesn't become the next president because he is a pretty shady character. Have you been following all the legal happenings with him? I'll keep checking back at your website for all the new additions!”
Thank you for your kind words, questions and comments. This is the kind of participation I look forward to. This is one way we can encourage dialogue and discourse.

Thursday, May 12, 2005

More thoughts from Albuquerque

Be sure to visit my website, www.leecuesta.com for the (almost) complete report concerning my time in Albuquerque, at the University of New Mexico, with Dr. Charles Truxillo, and the students from ECDN. In fact, there are links to the ECDN’s website from my website (go to the Portal). I just wrote “almost” complete report, because only by reading my blog, which you are now doing, will you receive the elements that I decided to delete from my official report.
What stood out the most: Reflecting upon my conversation with Dr. Truxillo, I think a statement that stood out the most, was that he said he wanted to retire in Querétaro, a Mexican city (and state) in the central part of the country. This, in spite of his work to promote La República del Norte; despite the recent web-publication of his paper, “The Inevitability of a Mexicano Nation in the American Southwest and Northern Mexico.” If La República del Norte is going to be such a wonderful place, then why doesn’t he want to stay and live in it? I even checked the 2080 map of La República del Norte at the ECDN website, since the northern Mexico states will be included. I thought that he might be able to retire in Querétaro, and still reside in La República del Norte. But no. According to this map, Querétaro will remain in Mexico. (I just realized the answer to my question. Truxillo doesn’t expect to still be alive by the year 2080. So, since he won’t be alive to see the realization of La República del Norte, then he might as well retire in Querétaro.)
Before our meeting, I went to the UNM Bookstore because I had intended to buy Truxillo’s book that was published in 2001. The title is “By the Sword and the Cross: The Historical Evolution of the Catholic World Monarchy in Spain and the New World, 1492-1825.” I found it in the textbook section. But I was literally taken aback to discover that Truxillo’s book costs approximately $90.oo at the university bookstore. At Amazon.com, the price of his book is $85.oo, although there are six used ones starting at $76.88. And his book has only 136 pages! Unbelievable! Some people have said that my book was too expensive – 380 pages, trade paperback, for $19.95. But after seeing Truxillo’s book, I think that my book is a real bargain! Needless to say, I haven’t been able to purchase Truxillo’s book yet.
Dr. Truxillo said he believes that Catholicism is important in society as an institution; by this he was implying that it is an absolutely stable element in society, a foundational element; it has always been there and always will be. He compared this with the relatively recent uprise of evangelical churches in Hispanic and Latin American communities: when converts lose their first burst, he said, the experience is gone. (And then they have nothing left, he implied, because they’ve gone away from the Catholic church.) However, he stated that the influence of the evangelical church is beneficial because it “keeps machismo under control” re: drinking and womanizing. He also said that most Chicanos are simply secular – i.e., religion is simply absent from their lives.
After our meeting, it was raining in Albuquerque, with some sunshine, and there was a brilliant, complete rainbow; all the colors, glowing, from one edge of the city to the other; it was stunning – so brilliant, in fact, that people on the sidewalks were stopping to look at it, in spite of the rain. And it forced me to wonder what kind of harbinger this was – either for me personally, or for La República Del Norte.

Monday, May 9, 2005

Two links contain insights concerning Mexico

Here’s a link to a great editorial in The Gazette:
http://www.gazette.com/display.php?id=1307495&secid=13
I am refering to only the first editorial in that section, which is entitled “Freedom under fire: Mexican journalists deserve combat pay.” It illustrates very well one of the themes of my book – “elements that render neighboring cultures so incompatible.” And here’s another link that reveals the current frontrunner to become Mexico’s next president:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/americas/05/09/mexico.mayor.ap/index.html
I want this blog to be two things: a place that is an accurate and up-to-date resource concerning Mexican (and Norteño) culture, and an opportunity for dialogue. Please comment on any of the blog entries that I post. I value your participation.

Thursday, May 5, 2005

My website launched today, Cinco de Mayo

Today is Cinco de Mayo, 2005, which is 5/5/05. And this is the day that my website officially launched. This is its first full day of operation. My website is leecuesta.com. Here's the direct link:
http://www.leecuesta.com
Thanks to Mediaframe for all their help in getting everything posted, and for the great way that it looks and functions! So I just wanted to document the fact that today just happens to be the first day, 5/5/05, which was not intentional. And that forces me to contemplate the numerical significance (5/5/05), just like the title of my book, Once:Once (or 11:11).

Wednesday, May 4, 2005

11:11 experiences

I want you to share with me and my blog your “11:11 experiences” – how frequently and in what circumstances you involuntarily observe 11:11 on a digital clock or watch. Is it on the microwave oven? Is it on the computer at work? Or do you “just happen” to glance at your watch, and the time says “11:11”? What is your experience, and what does it mean to you? Why is this significant? Please vote on the poll at my website – leecuesta.com – how frequently you involuntarily observe 11:11 on a digital clock or watch. Feel free to post your comments here. Is there an impending 11:11 convergence? Be sure to read Appendix IV in my book, Once: Once, which means “11:11” in Spanish. Published four years ago, in 2001, my book, Once:Once (pronounced “OWN-say, OWN-say”), describes a convergence, both historical and mystical, which eleven:eleven signifies. In Appendix IV of my book, I wrote: “The 11:11 phenomenon includes several dimensions …yet they involve varying degrees of spirituality and mysticism. The most visible of these is the subconscious prompting to witness the flash of ’11:11’ on a digital clock or wristwatch. …So universal is this experience, in fact, that one leader organized an ’11:11 event’ in 1992. At 11:11 a.m., 11:11 p.m. and 11:11 Greenwich Mean Time on January 11, many thousands of participants across the globe, dressed only in white, presented dances that the leader had designed as an attempt to induce ‘those on high’ to open a mystical doorway, which will permit humans to step into the ‘next dimension of consciousness.’ …For many, 11:11 on a digital clock represents the only moment in time that looks the same in a mirror. For others, it signifies the moment at which there is perfect alignment, which the parallel lines of 11:11 indicate.”
Elsewhere, one psychic concurs: “All over the world, people are noting the 11.11 phenomenon. They see it on their watches, clocks, microwave ovens and computers. The 11.11 enigma is meaningful, they know, but there are dozens of theories about it.” He says that “for many years (he) has learned from and worked with his very own ‘group of Celestials,’” and that “11.11 is their worldwide ‘trademark,’ ‘call sign,’ or ‘courtesy reminder call.’”
For this reason (due to its mystical, spiritual and visionary elements), my book, Once:Once, has a five-star review at a website called spiritdimension.com.

Has your phone ever rung precisely at 11:11? Who was calling?

Some say that to pray precisely within the moment of 11:11 is to experience an entirely open channel to the Cosmic Awareness.

About Me

My photo
LEE CUESTA, a journalist who worked in Mexico City, has written about the complexities in Chiapas for a decade, acquiring firsthand experience in both Tuxtla Gutiérrez and San Cristóbal de Las Casas. As a fully bilingual writer, the author has been published in periodicals such as Northwest, Eternity, World Pulse, Indian Life, Interlit, Prisma, El Faro and Apuntes Pastorales. The articles receive international response. In addition, Cuesta is the author of the novel entitled Once: Once, about religious intolerance and an independence movement in Chiapas, along with a conspiracy to recapture territory that once belonged to Mexico. In it, he combines the skills of a storyteller and investigative reporter to penetrate the historical, social and spiritual dimensions of this convincing tale. It provides a rare and stunning glimpse into the elements that render neighboring cultures so incompatible.

How to make comments

I realize that only those who have an account at blogger or gmail are permitted to post comments to my blog directly -- here at this website. Therefore, all the rest of you should send your comments to info@leecuesta.com and I will copy and paste them so that they will appear here. Keep those comments coming!